First, an important note: I like to give credit where credit is due. In last week’s column, I noted several compact PCs, but forgot to credit ExtremeTech forum member Chris Flock, who dug up the info on the Logisys PCs. Thanks, Chris!
When I wrote my little opinion piece on the Mac mini, it stirred up quite a storm of email, forum posts and even other articles on the topic. Quite a few ExtremeTech readers pointed me to this MacWorld column. In a comparison between the Mac mini and a less-expensive Dell, it’s probably no surprise that a Mac-oriented site would declare the mini the winner. On the other hand, Ed Stroglio over at Overclockers.com wrote a more detailed analysis comparing the Mac mini to a Dell and declared it a wash.
Some readers saw my comparison to x86-based small-form-factor PCs and noted that the majority of these are more expensive, so naturally the Mac mini is better. Other readers agreed with me, in some cases taking pointed slams at Apple. A number of readers made cogent arguments that the Mac mini was indeed the perfect PC “for grandma,” noting that cost wasn’t necessarily the most important issue for that class of user.
As I read through all this, the gestalt of the matter struck me: We’re all missing the bigger picture, just like the blind men and the elephant. In that old parable, each blind wise man touches a part of an elephant and declares that the elephant must be similar to that individual part. The man touching the leg declares that the elephant is like a tree, while the one who touches the trunk notes that the elephant must be like a snake.
Let’s talk about my own set of blinders. Having written for years about PC hardware and PC gaming, my inclination is towards building or buying effective PC game platforms. And since I build most of my own systems, I tend to love the sort of vast, chaotic array of choices that exist for the PC.
The key difference between the Mac and the PC is one of choice. With the PC, you get a staggering array of choices, even with the basic system platform. With the Mac, the choices are made for you ahead of time.
It’s easy to then start assigning value judgments:
CHOICE = GOOD; THEREFORE LACK OF CHOICE = BAD
But the situation is really not that simple. If I were buying a system for grandma (or, in the case of our family, my brother-in-law), I’d build one similar to the
But for those who don’t have an ExtremeTech analyst to build a PC for them, a pre-built, preconfigured machine could be just the thing. And for someone with limited space and little time or inclination to learn about their system, the Mac mini might well be a good answer. But then, so would a PC pre-configured with a good Linux distro like Xandros—one example being the sub-$200 Wal-Mart PC.
Stylistically, though, the Wal-Mart PC is indeed bulky and rather unattractive, while the mini wouldn’t be out of place in a modern kitchen.
So what’s the right answer? As always, “it depends.” Most of us here at ExtremeTech are enamored of the rich set of choices. You could even make a case that we make our living giving people a little clarity when faced with the confusing array of choices. But for a normal consumer, those very choices may be simply overwhelming.
It’s great to be in an industry that offers both options. The universe of PC users and PC systems is large enough to encompass every user’s need—and that sort of choice is good. Viva la difference!
Jason Cross puts